<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAS vs. Windows Home Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/</link>
	<description>Tech Questions Answered by a Girl Geek</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: xander</title>
		<link>http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-35530</link>
		<dc:creator>xander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-35530</guid>
		<description>I bought a WDMBworldedition1  it worked beautifully for about a week or two then I started to get the 'failed mount' error. Search this has revealed that it seems to be a horrible product with lots of people in forums clamoring for a class action suit.
In addition to this the WDAnywhereBackUp software functions poorly, especially when compared with WD's previous backup software that was simple and actually worked.
If only drobo wasn't so damn expensive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a WDMBworldedition1  it worked beautifully for about a week or two then I started to get the &#8216;failed mount&#8217; error. Search this has revealed that it seems to be a horrible product with lots of people in forums clamoring for a class action suit.<br />
In addition to this the WDAnywhereBackUp software functions poorly, especially when compared with WD&#8217;s previous backup software that was simple and actually worked.<br />
If only drobo wasn&#8217;t so damn expensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>My concern would be Mac &#38; PC compatibility with WHS...I've heard that it doesn't support Macs right now.  However, a Linux-based NAS should support just about anything connecting to it, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern would be Mac &amp; PC compatibility with WHS&#8230;I&#8217;ve heard that it doesn&#8217;t support Macs right now.  However, a Linux-based NAS should support just about anything connecting to it, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Providers Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Providers Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Hosting Providers Directory...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry, it just sounds like a crazy idea for me :)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Hosting Providers Directory&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, it just sounds like a crazy idea for me :)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>The windows home server does enable printer sharing but there are many NASes that offer that as well as other things. For example the NAS i own will serve a webpage, serve as a FTP server, stream media to the network, automatically backup my computer, and download torrents and other files on its own. You can also expand it for mirroring with a usb harddrive. This product with 1TB of self installed storage (2x500GB drives) comes to $549.97 from newegg.com heres the links to the HDs im using and the NAS. 
http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822110015
http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822136073</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The windows home server does enable printer sharing but there are many NASes that offer that as well as other things. For example the NAS i own will serve a webpage, serve as a FTP server, stream media to the network, automatically backup my computer, and download torrents and other files on its own. You can also expand it for mirroring with a usb harddrive. This product with 1TB of self installed storage (2&#215;500GB drives) comes to $549.97 from newegg.com heres the links to the HDs im using and the NAS.<br />
<a href="http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822110015" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822110015</a><br />
<a href="http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822136073" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822136073</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekBrief.TV &#124; Video Podcast &#187; Archive &#187; GBTV #0222 &#124; GeekBrief.TV</title>
		<link>http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekBrief.TV &#124; Video Podcast &#187; Archive &#187; GBTV #0222 &#124; GeekBrief.TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dearcali.com/nas-vs-windows-home-server/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>[...] vs. Windows Home Server &#124; Link to the Post Windows Home Server My Book World Edition HP MediaSmart Home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vs. Windows Home Server | Link to the Post Windows Home Server My Book World Edition HP MediaSmart Home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
